Archive for November, 2009
Innovation Stiffling Government Aids Groundbreaking Artistry
To follow up on an earlier posting that contended that government sponsored initiatives are capable of producing innovation in broadcasting I thought it was also worth highlighting our CanCon radio requirements and the Canadian Music Fund. I’ll touch on CanCon in this posting and have something regarding the Canadian Music Fund in a piece to come later.
CanCon is shorthand for ‘Canadian Content’ and the label mostly explains itself; by law a certain amount of radio airplay must be Canadian Content. The ratio of necessary ‘Canadianess’ varies depending on what genre(s) of music the station broadcasts, as well as the particular market they are in but a good shorthand is to figure that 25% of the broadcast content must be Canadian. While not a perfect mechanism (it’s easy to find people arguing that CanCon should be entirely scrapped) it does serve to keep Canadian content on the airwaves. While reading through Wikipedia’s article on this I saw the Arcade Fire mentioned as an example demonstrating CanCon’s failure. It was only after the band started getting played in heavy rotation in the States that heavy Canadian airplay followed. A counter example though would be the massive explosion of Feist; vehicles for promoting Canada’s independent artists were more refined in 2007 than they were in 2005 (ie CBC Radio3) and her airplay was building in Canada before the iPod commercial featuring “1-2-3-4″ sent her into the stratosphere. As I see it, the problem with CanCon as it stands is that there is not enough emphasis on new artists and recordings. Instead of scrapping the whole system it should be tweaked, so that if a broadcaster features new recordings, a certain percentage of their Canadian content has to be new as well. Vancouver has a relatively new commercial radio station, The Peak FM that seems to be having some success playing lots of new, independent Canadian artists. Hopefully they are starting to turn a profit so my referencing them is relevent.
Related Posts
- How Wrong Is It To Contractually Require Promoters To Not Denigrate (Your Product)? A short while back on the CBC Radio3 blog, host Tariq Hussein linked to a blog post by Carey Mercer, the lead singer of the band Frog Eyes. In this post he was lamenting the...
- Despite The Expletive Name, Fucked Up Are Conscientious Citizens [/caption] Who are these two beautiful men celebrating with a kiss and just what are they celebrating? On the right is CBC Radio3 host and Canadian music maven Grant Lawrence. On the left, Damian 'Pink...
- Random Thoughts Music can bring on many emotions and memories. It's funny how you can hear a certain song, and that song transports you back in time to...
- Bring Your Weblog to Life with Video Blogs Perhaps you have not noticed that there has been a tremendous explosion in the way of online media, especially throughout the past couple of years....
Olympics and all that
Thursday evening saw a divided panel come together for a public forum on security and civil liberties during the 2010 Olympics at the SFU Harbour Centre. The forum was organized by the Impact on Communities Coalition and consisted of Integrated Security Unit chief Bud Mercer, Vancouver Police Department deputy chief Steve Sweeney, BC Civil Liberties Association director David Eby, Vancouver City Councilor Geoff Meegs, Pivot Legal Society attorney Laura Track, Vancouver Organizing Committee director of corporate rights and management Bill Cooper and anti-Olympics activist Alissa Westergard-Thorpe. There was another panelist speaking from an anti-Olympics stance, but this writer did not catch her name and has not been able to find a complete speakers list online. My apologies to her. The forum was moderated by IOCC director Am Johal.
The panel was clearly separated into two camps: organizing and security personnel on one side and those against the Olympics due to concerns about civil liberties infringements, both against those exercising political protest and the homeless on the other.
Civil rights advocates first highlighted the history of the IOC’s desire to present a ‘clean’ image of the games and the lack of communication from VANOC to the IOC that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is the law of the land and must inevitably hold sway over efforts at image and brand control. They further argued that the passing of the city’s 2010 Olympic and Paralympic bylaw, providing officials with the power to remove messaging throughout the city, along with the more recent provincial passage of the Assistance to Shelter Act not only flout the Charter rights but fly directly in the face of the bid committee’s Inner-City Inclusive Commitment Statement.
Panelists representing different organizational facets of the games highlighted upcoming changes to the city’s Olympic bylaw they say clarify their position that actions will only be taken against commercial messaging, not political messages. Additionally they indicated these upcoming changes will limit the scope of both the time frame for these changes in enforcement as well as the physical areas that constitute Olympic Venues where enforcement will take place. Outside of the venues, protest would be handled “business as usual” according to deputy chief Sweeney. Aside from these messages, Mr. Mercer and Mr. Sweeney both underlined that they are in charge of difficult exercises in logistics. The audience was not particularly sympathetic to this point.
Should organizers insistence that only commercial messaging will be targeted for removal prove to hold true then I will be satisfied that rights to speech are being protected sufficiently. Nonetheless the fact that it has taken this long to present clarifying language from the city on the original bylaw that was so clearly an infringement on free speech liberties is disturbing. Smarter minds than myself have not been mollified as easily. Chris Shaw, a UBC professor who brought forward a lawsuit in response to the cities bylaw describes the proposed changes as “more superficial than substantive” and has indicated his suit “won’t end until the civil liberties playing field for all of us gets a lot more level.”
Related Posts
- The Colour Red To Bring Notice To Homelessness During Games [/caption] While it will be easy enough to find red (and white) in Vancouver this February, PIVOT Legal Society is hoping that you notice the colour for a different reason, as they kick off a...
- Building Towards The Big Hockey Game I am a newer resident of Vancouver, and was only 10 years old when the Vancouver Canucks lost game 7 of the Stanley Cup Playoffs in '94 and rioting erupted throughout the streets. I don't...
- Finally Some Justice – Reverse Discrimination Takes a Hit (Ricci v. DeStefano) Despite writing a personal finance blog, I enjoy chatting up politics and I think I have been very open about my political views, which are...
- Golf as an Olympic Sport? Top golf players are full of enthusiasm as their appointed ambassadors work to have golf included as an Olympic sport. Players are citing that the...
From the Department of: Three wrongs don’t equal 193%
Via Brad DeLong’s ongoing series ‘Why oh why can’t we have a better press corps?”:
My first reaction is to be grateful that my country does not consider the outlet in question a legitimate part of the press corps. Then I remember that the economic winds in this nation are largely dependent on the country that does have the source of the above as part of it’s media. Sigh.
Related Posts
- It's Budget Week! It has been a big week from a political standpoint; Parliament reconvened with a Speech from the Throne on Wednesday and Federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty tabled his governments latest federal budget on Thursday. Before...
- Stephen Harper: Tactician Extraordinaire [/caption] Amidst reflecting on the year gone by, looking forward to the coming one and forming resolutions that will more often than not be forgotten by February, the end of 2009 also brought the opportunity...
- Quick and Dirty Tips for Effective Corporate Blogging, pt 5 The last four blog entries (1, 2, 3, 4) have touched on eleven vital tips for crafting good blog entries and keeping your corporate blog...
- Erin Burnett: Why I Would Not Impress CNBC's Anchor For a variety of non-financial reasons, I like to read Men's Health from cover to cover each month. I know it's not as entertaining as...
Prostitution and Pragmatics
the public with an opportunity to learn about the men who buy sex, the experiences of sex workers with their clients, and why neither sex workers nor their clients should be criminalized
The turnout of over 120 individuals (all seating used plus standing room) indicates at the very least that this is an issue the public is interested in and desires more information on it.
The forum began with the viewing of a short film entitled We want to save you (and if you don’t appreciate it, you will be punished!) The film is an interview with Pye Jacobsson, a sex worker and activist from Sweden. She succinctly outlines the background behind Sweden’s adoption of statutes that have criminalized the purchase of sexual services while making the sale of sexual services legal. Pye then goes on to explain the effects of this legal regime on Sweden’s sex workers. The video is at the end of this post.
Following the video was a to the point talk given by Jody Salerno. She discussed her history of growing up in an abusive home and emphatically underlined her main point that the criminalization of sex consumers puts sex workers at higher risk.
Next, Chris Atchison presented some fascinating data from his “John’s Voices” project. Picking up on the point that Jody had started to make, that sex consumers are regular people, Chris’ findings made this notion extremely clear. Sex consumers come from all walks of life, different socioeconomic classes and demographically are very similar to the country as a whole.
Following a short break, Susan Davis presented some information from a new resource entitled Trade Secrets. This online guide draws on a wealth of knowledge from sex workers and consumers both. The excellent schedule the panel put together had Susan presenting viewpoints of sex consumers that reinforced much of the picture that had already been started by Chris. Suprising to some would be the extremely high levels of respect and care that most sex consumers appear to demonstrate towards those workers whose services they use.
Finally, Tamara O’Doherty tied everything up nicely by presenting a side by side comparison of the law as it stands in both Sweden and Canada as well as the consequences of those laws. Despite a different statutory system in either country, the end results ended up being very similar. The criminalization of sex work does not and cannot prevent individuals from entering the sex trade. Criminalization enhances stigma and endangers sex workers. It conflates sex work with other issues, that although related and connected, such as human trafficking and abuse, are different. The conflation of these important issues is a detriment to making improvements in them on all fronts.
Related Posts
- In Response To Paul Sullivan's '5 Reasons' Against The Vancouver Games [/caption] In an editorial comment from Wednesday's Metro Vancouver, Paul Sullivan outlined his five reasons to not 'Believe' in the Olympic Games. While I can appreciate the jab at CTV, the Canadian broadcaster for the...
- How Wrong Is It To Contractually Require Promoters To Not Denigrate (Your Product)? A short while back on the CBC Radio3 blog, host Tariq Hussein linked to a blog post by Carey Mercer, the lead singer of the band Frog Eyes. In this post he was lamenting the...
- Auto Insurance Broker Vs Auto Insurance Agent: What's The Difference? Sometimes the terminology in the insurance industry can be misleading to consumers who spend money on services they don’t even need. One such mistake often...
- A Little About Dulcimers A dulcimer is a fretted instrument that most commonly includes three or four strings. The fretting is usually diatonic and spreads along a fingerboard attached...
Robson Square Rink Reopens
Walking through the newly renovated Robson Square early last week, a security guard approached me to ensure that I was not about to jump out onto the not quite completed ice surface and slide across. I suppose I must have had that glint in my eye. After reassuring him that I would control myself, he let me know that next week sometime the ice would be re-opened to the public. Today at noon that proved to be true as reopening ceremonies were held that included an appearance and skate by Olympic Bronze medalist and 2008 Mens’ World Champion, Jeffrey Buttle.
The skating rink has not been in use since the end of winter in 2000 due to cost concerns. Thanks to a sponsorship from GE that sees the venue renamed as the GE Ice Plaza and the expenditure of $1.6 million over the past three years outdoor skating has returned to downtown Vancouver. Public skating continues daily from noon to 9pm through the start of the 2010 Winter Games. Access to the ice is free and if you do not own skates, rentals are available for $3.00
(Photo by Kirsten Thompson/Metro Vancouver)
Update
The skating facilities will be open daily from 9am to 9pm, not from 12-9 as originally reported
Related Posts
- Slow Week, Fast Week This last week of the year (and decade) has been very enjoyable and relaxing for myself as I've just returned home from a visit to my families house in Northwestern Ontario but it appears that...
- Dr. Stephen T. Colbert, DFA (And Sports Psychologist) [/caption] Stephen Colbert and the Colbert Nation's sponsorship of the US speed skating team was a story I wrote about when it first came about, but I foolishly haven't been posting on any of the...
- Three Week Diet & Fitness Plan Nutritious eating and moderate exercise yield a physically healthy human body. Eating and exercise must occur in a sustainable manner so as to become a...
- Toddler Adjustable Ice Skates The Toddler 615 comes in designs for both boys (modern, cool, tough black) and ladies (a sublime silver and pink look). Like our number of...
Concerning Conservatives and the Environment, Go With Your Gut
I’m a little late coming to this, but while reading through some CBC news stories from earlier in the week I came across this. What a joke. Environment minister Jim Prentice tells us that Canadian climate change legislation is several years off and that there is no way forward until both a cross border agreement with the US and and international treaty to replace Kyoto are completed. Of course an international accord is needed. Of course a deal with our American partners is needed. None of these is a barrier to Canada moving forward in trying to meet goals that we have already set out.
When I was writing about this issue earlier, I hedged my initial skepticism towards the Prime Ministers comments from overseas. Harper’s statement that a global coalition is needed to create real progress on the climate change issue, while correct, smelled like a delay tactic to me. Being that the Conservatives have tabled specific goals (be they correct or not is not for me to speculate on) my view was that the most important step was still to be taken; developing legislation to realize these goals. It seems like there is no such luck, at least so far.
With the Americans actually moving forward on enacting laws on this front (a bill has passed the House and it’s expected to be taken up by the Senate in the new year) what is the real cause for Canada’s seemingly continued ambivalence? More likely than not it does stem from something nefarious, but rather apathy. It’s time to move forward.
Related Posts
- The New Shape And Direction Of The Canadian Senate Following through with what his spokesperson indicated at the time of the prorogation of parliament, Prime Minister Harper made five new appointments to the Senate this past Friday, bringing the Conservative Party to a total...
- Stephen Harper: Tactician Extraordinaire [/caption] Amidst reflecting on the year gone by, looking forward to the coming one and forming resolutions that will more often than not be forgotten by February, the end of 2009 also brought the opportunity...
- Global Leaders Call On Canada To Fight Climate Change In New Ad African leaders including Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Jay Naidoo of former President Nelson Mandela's cabinet, and Zwelinzima Vavi, general secretary of the Congress...
- Half Way Through 2011 Reviewing my Goals and Objectives I religiously check out all the blogs on my blogroll and today I came across an article that really caught my attention by Crystal who...
As Good as TV Gets
Rodney Balko flags down this great compilation of quotes from the greatest television series to ever hit the airwaves.
To many people have not seen this amazing show. If that includes yourself you should really consider changing that fact. With the holidays upon us now, The Wire: The Complete Series would make a great present.
Related Posts
- Lil Harper and the Environment Seeing this news clip* over the weekend got me to wondering about Canada's current environmental policy. I was getting ready to slag the governments inaction on this front over the past couple years but I figured...
- Olympics and all that Thursday evening saw a divided panel come together for a public forum on security and civil liberties during the 2010 Olympics at the SFU Harbour Centre. The forum was organized by the Impact on Communities...
- The 5 Worst Ways to Save Money There are many ways that people save money, and many people are very effective and saving loads of money because of them. But this list...
- Where to Find the Collectors Coins You Want to Buy There are a lot of different coins you are likely to want to add to your collection. The different collectors coins you are interested in...
I Love the Smell of Beaver Musk in the Cold, Cold Morning
Responding yesterday to Stephen Colbert in just the way that we’ve been looking for was Ted Townsend, the spokesperson for the City of Richmond. In an open letter to Colbert in response to the one on the right, Townsend said the following:
We have always welcomed our friends from south of the border with open arms (well, except for that period in 1812). In fact, we’ve always fondly considered you as our American “cousins” and politely tolerated you, even when you were in an imperialistic mood…
It takes a lot to upset us…after all, the combination of the languid smell of beaver musk and the freezing temperatures generally make us a docile people…
So as the Canadian Iceholes who also happen to be the proprietors of the Richmond Olympic Oval, we are inviting you to find yourself some sled dogs and venture forth to our great frozen wasteland to be our guest at the 2010 Olympic Games.
Good on Ted for grabbing the media attention that is being served up on a platter. Should Stephen accept the offer he would become an official ombudsman for the games; provided he wears a pink toque his entire time here. That’s perfect! Via Margaret Sheridan’s sports blog at canoe.ca we learn that a CBC sports anchor has challenged Colbert to a race. They’ve got the right idea, but lets get some star power behind this! Time to lace ‘em up Mercer.
Related Posts
- Friday Announcements This afternoon will see announcements on two big news stories that are only mildly related. On the political front, Prime Minister Stephen Harper is set to appoint five new Conservative senators later today. In sporting...
- Undue Canada Bashing From Colbert Continues Stephen Colbert's assault on the Canadian speed skating team and Canada in general continued this Thursday on 'The Sport Report' (pronounced The Spore Rapport) when Stephen once again attacked Canada in regards to his beef...
- Which UK Political Party has the Best Sports Manifesto? With 24 hours to go before the UK’s General Election we have heard everything we need to know about immigration, schooling and crime but one...
- Sports Memorabilia Appraisal Perhaps you have found the perfect piece of sports memorabilia, signed by your favorite sports star, and you are just about to make the purchase....
Lil Harper and the Environment
Seeing this news clip* over the weekend got me to wondering about Canada’s current environmental policy. I was getting ready to slag the governments inaction on this front over the past couple years but I figured on gathering some information first. I remember that in 2006/07 this was at the forefront of discussion in this country but seemed to fall by the wayside without any resolution occurring on the way to go forward. The Conservatives put forward a plan that was widely panned as emissions targets were pegged to growth in industry; the end result would be that while relative levels of carbon emissions would go down, it was possible that the overall levels could increase. Harper then took another kick at the can and released a proposal to reach somewhat more ambitious targets and scrapped the mechanism that would have allowed the scenario I just mentioned. Since then the issue seems to have fallen by the wayside, both in any developments and in the nations consciousness.
In the linked to video Harper is speaking to reporters about the need for unified action on this issue. He is right about this. Canada is a very small emitter relative to others and even combined plans from the developed world (US, Canada, Eurozone) would not be sufficient. It is imperative that BRIC nations are included in efforts to reduce emissions as well. For whatever reason though I had a very hard time taking what Harper was saying in good faith. To my ear, it sounded more like a delaying tactic than a true, practical assertion; necessary players aren’t moving forward (China, India) so there’s no point in us doing so until they are on board.
This suspicion is what prompted me to ask what our environmental policies currently are. So I fired up my magic connected tubes and headed over to Environment Canada’s webpage on climate change. It turns out things were much as I remembered them. Some goals have been set to reduce emissions, 20% by 2020 and 60-70% by 2050. Reduced 20% from what though? 2006 levels. This was a sticking point with environmentalists (scientists too?) for not being ambitious enough. I don’t have any level of expertise to judge this but other targets I’ve seen use 1996 as the baseline year to judge reductions against. Another goal listed is to have 90% of Canada’s power production come from non carbon emitting sources by 2020. I believe that it is important that we have goals set to work towards. The feasibility/merits of those goals are for others to judge. I am happy that we at least have targets to work towards. More important though are the underlying policies; what mechanism are we going to use to meet this goals? Cap and Trade or a Carbon Tax? Is there some other tool that I haven’t heard of? This section would seem to indicate that those policies have not been set
The Government of Canada is taking an aggressive approach to achieve real environmental and economic benefits for Canadians.Our plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is on track. We are currently fine-tuning our approach to tackling climate change, and will introduce a full suite of domestic policies addressing all major sources of emissions prior to the UN meetings in Copenhagen this December. The content and timing of the regulations implementing these policies will be driven by Canada’s national interests, while also accounting for the actions of our trading partners, including the U.S.
Related Posts
- The New Shape And Direction Of The Canadian Senate Following through with what his spokesperson indicated at the time of the prorogation of parliament, Prime Minister Harper made five new appointments to the Senate this past Friday, bringing the Conservative Party to a total...
- Supreme Court Holds Off From Setting New Precedent, For Now [/caption] Friday was an extremely busy day and things did not all go Stephen Harper's way. The Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, held in part an appeal brought forth by the Prime Minister in...
- Creating a Successful Family Finance Plan Whether you are an old hat at marriage and family or whether you are a newlywed trying to navigate through the new territory of sharing...
- Success Doesn't Always Come Easy On a raw, cold day in the European Alps, Lance Armstrong steered his bike into the sleeting snow, then stopped. His partner riding in the...
I Have a Counterfactual to Something Yglesias Said
In passing along some thoughts on the now in theatres film Pirate Radio, Matt Yglesias makes the following observation:
It also comes [...] with a strong libertarian, anti-statist message. And of course it’s quite true that a public agency getting involved in the arts is likely to tend toward propagation of the status quo rather than toward innovation. The German government does a lot of subsidizing of opera, and by most accounts [...] they do a very good job of mounting good performances of the classic works. But boosting innovation, the way an illegal offshore radio broadcaster like the one depicted in the movie could, is not the forte of a state broadcaster.
If you’ve ever spent anytime on Matt’s blog then you probably already know that he’s a self-admitted Canadaphile. Part of his love for Canada extends from our waves of beautiful, bold, lush (insert positive adjectives here ad infinitum) Indie music. At the end of the day he posts a tab dump along with a link to some music; I’ve seen more than a fair share of Canadian Indie darlings linked to from there. Heck, yesterday’s post linked to the song “Black Rice” by Calgary, Alberta’s own WOMEN along with a favourable comparison to the Beatles. Other bands getting big name blogger love in the past include The Most Serene Republic, Metric, Tegan & Sara and The Arcade Fire.
Those bands bring me to my point: all of them have been huge beneficiaries of Canada’s socialist broadcaster, the venerable Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, or the Ceeb to those who love it. Everyone of these groups has received exposure on CBC’s terrestrial broadcasts but owe a much larger debt to Radio3. If you find yourself asking “What’s Radio3?” you should get thyself to a nunnery their homepage. In short they are ‘a Canadian Independent Music Superstation’ that is available through their webpage and on Sirius Satellite Radio channel 86. Aside from the hosted radio stream that is available you can listen to a genre stream such as Rock, Hip Hop or Electronica. Additionally, you can listen to any of the 80000+ tracks in their library by over 19000 bands on demand. Throw in some great podcasts (this one is a tribute to synthesizers, linked to by Matt in the past as well) along with a nationwide, searchable and filterable concert calendar and you have one of the most inclusive, innovative music communities going. All of it funded by the innovation suffocating guvmint.
Related Posts
- It Just Wasn't Our Day Congratulations go out to the US Under 20 Hockey Team, as they defeated Canada 6-5 in overtime to win the IIHF World Junior Championships in a game for the ages. Some records are meant to...
- How Wrong Is It To Contractually Require Promoters To Not Denigrate (Your Product)? A short while back on the CBC Radio3 blog, host Tariq Hussein linked to a blog post by Carey Mercer, the lead singer of the band Frog Eyes. In this post he was lamenting the...
- If you like jazz... Years ago I had a subscription to Jazziz magazine. What I liked about it, was that each month you receive a full length CD of...
- How to Get Kids Interested in Acoustic Music Getting children interested in music is not normally a difficult task, especially considering how many different types of music there are out there. If you...
Is Obama Looking for a Bone from Harper?
Writing in the Jurisprudence column at Slate.com, Dahlia Lithwick has an excellent article up regarding the Obama administrations decision to try some Gitmo detainees in federal court, while continuing to try others before military tribunals and how that mess intersects with the plight of Canadian citizen Omar Khadr that we discussed below. Her writing is superb and very enjoyable to read. I’ll only excerpt briefly as you really should go read the whole thing, but it did prompt me to pose a question.
While discussing the ongoing case before the Supreme Court of Canada whose aim is to decide if the Canadian Government is to be compelled to advocate for Khadr’s release to Canadian authorities, Lithwick wonders:
If today’s oral arguments aren’t enough to convince the Canadian Supreme Court to intercede on Khadr’s behalf, maybe Holder’s announcement will be.
One can only hope that the facts alone are enough for the court to find in Omar’s favour; this is a man who was a 15 year old youth when initially captured. He has languished in legal limbo for coming up on 8 years now. We know that he has received serious mistreatment while in captivity and that that mistreatment may well qualify as torture. I am not a lawyer and am not certain where the breach of this man’s charter rights occur. Both the Federal Court of Appeals and Justice O’Reilly though have found this to be the case already. It is now left to the Supreme Court to hopefully concur with their judgement.
In my earlier posting on this subject I was critical of Barack Obama for the two tiered system him and his attorney general have elected to go forward with; some cases moving to federal court, with others staying before the newly minted military tribunals. Dhalia’s musing above has lead me to wonder if Obama/Holders motive in keeping Khadr before the tribunal is at least partially rooted in hoping to force Canada’s hand into taking Khadr into custody. Are they intentionally signalling that our man will not receive a fair chance at justice, leaving the Canadian Supreme Court no option but to uphold the lower court decisions? The US administration can no doubt use any help it can get in getting the detainees out of Gitmo. Perhaps Obama is scratching his head wondering how much they’ve got to do to this guy before his government will step up to the plate for him. Not enough so far anyways. If the lower courts ruling is upheld it will be very interesting to see what the Harper Government’s response is.
Related Posts
- Despite The Expletive Name, Fucked Up Are Conscientious Citizens [/caption] Who are these two beautiful men celebrating with a kiss and just what are they celebrating? On the right is CBC Radio3 host and Canadian music maven Grant Lawrence. On the left, Damian 'Pink...
- Stephen Harper: Tactician Extraordinaire [/caption] Amidst reflecting on the year gone by, looking forward to the coming one and forming resolutions that will more often than not be forgotten by February, the end of 2009 also brought the opportunity...
- Liars, and Taxes, and Bonuses, Oh My! Who is to blame for the $165,000,000 bonuses at AIG? Now I know that before many of you read further, you have already formed an...
- Defense of Marriage Act Found Unconstitutional in One Federal District Court I wrote about Defense of Marriage Act back in May when discussing the topic of Same Sex Estate and Financial Planning. Well it turns out ...
Undue Canada Bashing From Colbert Continues
In order to further boost US patriotic pride, Colbert has now spearheaded a letter writing campaign to the Vancouver Organizing Committee; the downloadable template simply asks that us Canadians not be “ice-holes.” Hopefully VANOC will show some backbone and not yield to the collective force that is the Colbert Nation. I’m sure that the US team, along with all others will receive more than ample practice time at the beautiful new facility in Richmond; Stephen and the rest of the Colbert nation need to chill out. As a matter of bragging rights, in the unofficial head to head competition between the US and Canadian speed skating teams that I arbitrarily decided began when Stephen put Canada on notice last week, the Canadians continue to lead. Their six podium finishes at World Cup events so far this weekend (a second place finish from Christine Nesbitt and third place finish from Kristina Groves in the 1500m long track race along with a short track first from Francois-Louis Tremblay in the 500m, a third place finish by Charles Hamelin in the 1500m and second and third place spots on the podium for Kalyna Roberge and Marianne St. Gelais) outpaces the three podium finishes put up by their American rivals.
Related Posts
- Medal Hopes Mounting For Canada [/caption] In just over an hour the womens mogul competition's final round will begin. At the conclusion of the event Canada stands an extremely strong chance of winning it's first Olympic gold medal, both of...
- US Affordable Care Act: What's In It For Me? (Canadian Edition) Last week I noted some ways that healthcare reform in the States could adversely effect Canada. While that possibility is there, the potential to benefit Canada, indirectly, is there as well. Reform in the US...
- Cycling Glossary Continued Handicap - Handicap races are quite popular in Australia, in them, the racers start at different points on the track based on their performance. âScratch...
- Fière d'être Canadienne/ Proud to Be Canadian - Best Canadian Personal Finance Blogs Edition Happy Birthday Canada! Bonne Saint-Jean (tard, je sais...) and Happy Moving Day! Canadians don't seem to hang anywhere near as many Canadian flags on their...







