Posts Tagged ‘Omar Khadr’
Supreme Court Holds Off From Setting New Precedent, For Now
Friday was an extremely busy day and things did not all go Stephen Harper’s way. The Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, held in part an appeal brought forth by the Prime Minister in regards to the ongoing detainment by the US of Canadian citizen Omar Khadr. Previously, a Federal Court had agreed with Mr. Khadr’s petition to the court that his rights guaranteed under Section 7 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms had been violated, and ordered the government to begin to seek his repatriation. This ruling was upheld at the Federal Court of Appeals, leading to the appeal by the Government which was ruled upon on Friday. The Court held that the rights accorded to Mr. Khadr under the Charter have been violated but that directly ordering the government to seek his return to Canada was not appropriate, at this time. In sum, the Court decided to “grant Mr. Khadr a declaration that his Charter rights have been infringed, while
leaving the government a measure of discretion in deciding how best to respond.”
So, while the government does not have to immediately seek the return of Mr. Khadr, they are expected to respond in some manner to the Courts ruling that his Charter rights were and indeed continue to be violated. The Globe and Mail described the Courts ruling as a challenge to the Harper government saying that “a legal fist lies beneath [the ruling's] velvet glove.” In it’s ruling, the Court cited both the consistency of “the separation of powers and the well-grounded reluctance of courts to intervene in matters of foreign relations” but also noted that “courts are empowered to make orders ensuring that the government’s foreign affairs prerogative is exercised in accordance with the constitution.” All of this is to say that the matter of the ongoing detention of Omar Khadr is not over. I previously suggested that perhaps President Obama was looking for Prime Minister Harper to help him out in one small matter by seeking the return of Mr. Khadr. And why not? All other western nations, concerned with what we now know were entirely credible allegations of abuse and torture at Guantanamo sought, and received the return of any of their citizens being held in the black site. There is no reason that Canada should not, even at this late time, follow suit.
Related Posts
- Walking And Chewing Gum Something that I've tended to think about the current tenure of Prime Minister Stephen Harper is that although his government has pushed through (or tried to push through) much legislation that I personally disagree with...
- A Red/Green Coalition? That's what Justin Beach is suggesting over at his blog. Justin is a great writer who also happens to run a fantastic Canadian Music News blog, North by East West; I don't know where he...
- Obama - Show me the Money Every single day I have a friend, family member or co-worker talking to me about politics/economics. Â While, I don't see myself as above intelligent, I...
- Tips for Serving Here are some more useful tennis tips for improving your serving game. If you want to make improvements in your ability to serve, these tips...
Is Obama Looking for a Bone from Harper?
Writing in the Jurisprudence column at Slate.com, Dahlia Lithwick has an excellent article up regarding the Obama administrations decision to try some Gitmo detainees in federal court, while continuing to try others before military tribunals and how that mess intersects with the plight of Canadian citizen Omar Khadr that we discussed below. Her writing is superb and very enjoyable to read. I’ll only excerpt briefly as you really should go read the whole thing, but it did prompt me to pose a question.
While discussing the ongoing case before the Supreme Court of Canada whose aim is to decide if the Canadian Government is to be compelled to advocate for Khadr’s release to Canadian authorities, Lithwick wonders:
If today’s oral arguments aren’t enough to convince the Canadian Supreme Court to intercede on Khadr’s behalf, maybe Holder’s announcement will be.
One can only hope that the facts alone are enough for the court to find in Omar’s favour; this is a man who was a 15 year old youth when initially captured. He has languished in legal limbo for coming up on 8 years now. We know that he has received serious mistreatment while in captivity and that that mistreatment may well qualify as torture. I am not a lawyer and am not certain where the breach of this man’s charter rights occur. Both the Federal Court of Appeals and Justice O’Reilly though have found this to be the case already. It is now left to the Supreme Court to hopefully concur with their judgement.
In my earlier posting on this subject I was critical of Barack Obama for the two tiered system him and his attorney general have elected to go forward with; some cases moving to federal court, with others staying before the newly minted military tribunals. Dhalia’s musing above has lead me to wonder if Obama/Holders motive in keeping Khadr before the tribunal is at least partially rooted in hoping to force Canada’s hand into taking Khadr into custody. Are they intentionally signalling that our man will not receive a fair chance at justice, leaving the Canadian Supreme Court no option but to uphold the lower court decisions? The US administration can no doubt use any help it can get in getting the detainees out of Gitmo. Perhaps Obama is scratching his head wondering how much they’ve got to do to this guy before his government will step up to the plate for him. Not enough so far anyways. If the lower courts ruling is upheld it will be very interesting to see what the Harper Government’s response is.
Related Posts
- Canada's Subsidised Culture This is the third in a series of posts highlighting the merits of governement supporting artistic endeavours. I talked about Canada's government funded public broadcaster, and more specifically CBC Radio 3 here and about Canadian...
- Walking And Chewing Gum Something that I've tended to think about the current tenure of Prime Minister Stephen Harper is that although his government has pushed through (or tried to push through) much legislation that I personally disagree with...
- Defense of Marriage Act Found Unconstitutional in One Federal District Court I wrote about Defense of Marriage Act back in May when discussing the topic of Same Sex Estate and Financial Planning. Well it turns out ...
- States Put Federal Lawmakers in Their Place If you think that the federal government has gotten out of control, losing touch with real America, and only serves themselves and special interest lobbyists,...

